No definitive answer here for this one, but I have seen that the delays CAN be largely minimized under the latest BT4(+) specs.... down to 20ms or so theoretically(?).... Some of the older standards are 200ms+... 1/5 of a second could definitely be noticeable.
I suspect it depends largely on quality of implementation in hardware/firmware/software... just like anything else. Disappointed that my admittedly limited searching thusfar has not revealed a single-box solution for what I envision is the "the" solution.... ONE box with a breakout cable allowing one to plug the BT xceiver into the back of a K3s at BOTH the headphone and mic jacks and accommodate a wireless BT headset and/or earbuds+mic like the Jaybird Bluebuds or X2 or X3 updates. I LOVE my Jaybirds and they'd be an excellent field option... Heck, I'd use them for headphones here in the shack even if I didn't need the additional isolation of over-the-ear cups. I'd use them for SSB/FM... Not sure about CW.... I'm just beginning to learn code.... BUT the thought of using my Jaybirds with a KX2 in a mountain biking or backpacking setting.... interests me. 73, ______________________ Clay Autery, KY5G On 9/2/2017 12:13 AM, Vic Rosenthal wrote: > Is there a noticeable time delay when using Bluetooth? If so, it might be a > problem for monitoring CW sending (or voice, for that matter). > > Vic 4X6GP ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
