Bill, I have used Win4K3 from almost the first version of the product. I use it with my KX3, K3s and KPA500 and sometimes link my Expert Electronics ColibriNANO SDR receiver for use as a panadapter in addition to my P3.
I find it very useful when looking at or changing configuration settings on the K3s or KX3, such as EQ settings, but I do not use it on a daily basis as an interface to the radios. I find the knobs and buttons on the equipment to be more intuitive for normal operations. It is a very good tool to have for specific functions but I do not find it desirable to use in lieu of the radio’s controls on a daily basis. Good software, well done, great support, good functionality but not a daily driver in my shack. I am neither a DXer nor a Contester which may make a difference. Very73 - Mike - K9JRI > On Mar 27, 2018, at 10:32 AM, Bill DeVore <maxr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I posted the question in the QRZ and eHam forums but only got one response so > far. > > I’m evaluating the latest edition of Win4K3 and I’m not sure I see the > advantage of controlling the K Line through software as compared to doing so > directly. > > I want to be fair to the author so what am I missing that others see so > advantageous? > > Bill - W3PNM > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to k9...@mac.com ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
