A good Bayesian spam filter is quite effective and is implemented in several email clients.

Oh yes, you have to initially identify the Spam, but the filter learns what is spam and what is not and automatically directs it to the Junk folder.

The Embarq (CenturyLink) "reject everything" is IMHO the worst solution to Spam - it not only requires the respondent to go to extra steps saying you are genuine, but requires those using it to respond as well.

I know Thunderbird has the Bayesian spam filter built in, and yes, I identify anything that comes into my email with no reasonable content in the text body as Junk Mail. I do not count how many I receive, and I do not click on links that have no associated valid text telling me why I should click on it.

Just my opinion.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 11/9/2018 6:56 PM, W0FK wrote:
Geez guys, I have a spam filter. Sorry it’s an inconvenience to you, but I
was getting 300 a day snd had to do something

As running on the major sites as well



-----
St. Louis, MO

"The difference between stupidity and genius is that
genius has its limits." Albert Einstein


--
Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to donw...@embarqmail.com

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to