Let me add that even a quarter wave vertical is rarely a perfect match. The 50 
ohm point is almost never the same as the j0 point. HF broadcasters don’t even 
try for a match. Typically open wire line is used and the match is achieved at 
the transmitter output network. They pump up to 500KW into VSWRs over 2:1. 

Sent from my iPad

> On Mar 31, 2019, at 6:03 PM, Fred Jensen <k6...@foothill.net> wrote:
> 
> I also disagree.  AM broadcast verticals are designed to achieve a desired 
> pattern and main lobe elevation angle.  Over flat ground, 225 degrees will 
> optimize the ground wave coverage.  However, higher powered stations will 
> then suffer from self-interference at the coverage edges because the sky wave 
> and ground wave interfere.  It's common to shorten the antenna a bit to 
> perhaps 195 degrees or so which tends to reduce the self-interference.  Once 
> the pattern and main lobe angle have been defined, the feed point is matched 
> to the transmission line with an appropriate network.  Neither 225 degrees 
> [5/8 wave] nor 195 degrees are resonant lengths and both require a matching 
> network.
> 
> Many hams do not have the luxury of resonant antennas on every band.  It 
> seems perfectly reasonable to employ some sort of matching network to match 
> the feed point to the coax on bands where it is not resonant AND/OR does not 
> present a 50 ohm load to the coax and needing to do so does not imply there's 
> something wrong with the antenna.
> 
> 73,
> Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW
> Sparks NV DM09dn
> Washoe County
> 
>> On 3/31/2019 9:44 AM, W2xj wrote:
>> I would disagree. Most high power commercial operations use non-resonant 
>> mismatched antennas. Typically there is either a tuner at the antenna or 
>> open wire is used.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>>> On Mar 31, 2019, at 12:13 PM, Ken G Kopp <kengk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> If an antenna is showing a VSVR of 3:1, something about the situation
>>> is wrong, and most likely it's -not- the antenna.  Fix the problem … feed
>>> the antenna power where it's resonant, assuming the antenna is actually
>>> resonant on the amateur band of interest.  Expecting a tuner to compensate
>>> for a problem external to an antenna is unreasonable, IMO
>>> 
>>> 73!
>>> 
>>> Ken - K0PP
>>> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to