Yes. Historically a significant percentage of our K2 and K3 buyers chose the QRP model. In some cases operators use the radio as an IF for transverters, etc.
73, Wayne N6KR > On May 29, 2019, at 4:15 AM, John Stengrevics <jstengrev...@comcast.net> > wrote: > > Hi Wayne & Eric, > > I’ve asked this question twice already with no answer. Perhaps it’s the way > I phrased it. So, let me ask it a different way: > > 1. Noise Blanking: On the website, under K4 FAQ - Performance Differences, > it says "In a direct-sampling radio like the K4, the DSP can “see” a wider > bandwidth in its signal chain, allowing it to provide higher-performance > noise reduction, noise blanking…” Can you quantify the improvement of the K4 > over the K3S regarding noise reduction and noise blanking? > > 2. Sensitivity: Rob Sherwood’s transceiver test data shows the following > sensitivity for the K3S (in microvolts): > > 0.27 > 0.20b <http://www.sherweng.com/table.html#key> > 0.0810 <http://www.sherweng.com/table.html#key> > > b Built-in preamp actuated > 10 10 meter data, preamp ON > > How does the K4 compare with the K3S on this measure of sensitivity? > > > Thanks in advance. > > John > WA1EAZ > > > > > > Sensitivity > (uV) > > Sensitivity > (uV) > Sensitivity > (uV) > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
