If you have a working, unamplified D-104, the solution to this is quite simple.

Back in the 1990s, my transceiver was a TS-830S.  I had a pre-citizens band 
D-104.  These classic microphones were much heavier than the later ones and had 
a stamped serial number plate riveted to the head.

The output of these microphones was very high and, when connected to an input 
with an impedance of a few tens of thousands of ohms, the frequency response 
was very strident.  The Astatic data sheet for the D-104 contained a graph, 
with curves, which showed how a lower impedance load suppressed the mid range 
and bass response.  Inside the base of the push to talk stand, I placed a 787 
kilohm,, quarter-watt, metal film resistor in series with the hot side of 
crystal cartrige output.  

The D-104 no longer sounded shrill.  The response was silky smooth, as 
determined by transmitting into a dummy load and recording the audio from a 
second transceiver.  As a bonus, I could then run my mic gain at eleven o 
clock, rather than nine o clock.  This made it much easier to set the mic gain 
properly, as the control was not so touchy.  

I was actively DXing, back then, and the slightly modified D-104 did a great 
job of breaking pileups.  I was often complimented on my audio and often asked 
what microphone I was using.

Gary, K0CX 

“Most D-104 mikes are not suited for use with today's radios.? The 
original D-104 was designed to work into a load impedance of 4 meg-ohms 
or higher.? Today's radios microphone input is about 50k ohms or so.?? 
The result is then excessive load on the D-104 element.? This is the 
major cause of frequency response issues.  Bob McGraw”

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com 

Reply via email to