Jeff, The max power output from the K2 (or any transceiver) depends on dissipating the heat from the PA as well as the length of time the PA is producing output. The K2 will develop more power on some bands than others just due to the gain of the transmit stages vs. frequency.
I for one would not exceed 12 watts out for any significant length of time. The difference between 12 watts and 16 watts is only 1.25 dB and will not likely be heard at the receiving end. This power limit is not 'official' in any way and simply represents my personal opinion. The KAT2 will properly display the power output if (and only if) it is properly calibrated. I have calibrated many a KAT2 within 5% and I can say that it tracks very well at both the high and low ends as well as the center (except for extremely low levels where the diode knee becomes significant). If you wish to calibrate your KAT2 with accuracy, you will need a good dummy load - known to be 50 ohms resistive at the band of measurement to within 1%, and you will need to measure the RF Voltage with an accuracy of at least 5% (you can do that with a calibrated 'scope using a 10X probe across the dummy load and using interpolated readings). Oh, of course before you do the forward power calibration, you will need to adjust the KAT2 trimmer accurately - when adjusted properly, the KAT2 will display the same SWR with an accurate (1%) dummy load of 100 ohms value and also with a 25 ohm (1%) dummy load. After the trimmer is balanced in that manner, you can set the SWR indication to 2.0. If you calibrate the KAT2 in the manner above, you will achieve an accuracy equal to or exceeding that of the spec for a recently calibrated Bird wattmeter (5% of full scale) - how accurate the Bird is depends on the slug, if you have a 10 watt slug, it is accurate to within 1/2 watt, but a 100 watt slug yields an accuracy that can only be trusted to within 5 watts. If you simply calibrate the KAT2 wattmeter with any external wattmeter, all you can say about it is that the KAT2 calibration is almost as good as the external wattmeter, and that is not very good at all. Many wattmeter specs state 20% of the full scale reading - and that is 10 watts potential error on a 50 watt scale - and that error is the same regardless of the power level - just what it says, percentage of the full scale reading. I have not yet seen any information on the Elecraft wattmeter, but I can wager that it is quite accurate and can be used for calibration. There are many ICs available that will provide precision power measurements, but they are not used in the typical wattmeters available in hamshacks. EMRFD contains a lot of good information about accurate power measurement, and I refer you to that resource for further details. 73, Don W3FPR > -----Original Message----- > Hi gang, > > Now that we're at the bottom of the solar cycle, I'd like to be > able to run more than five watts on occasion, but not at the > expense of putting my final PA at risk. What is the highest > level of RF output power that a K2, QRP version, can run on CW > without putting the finals at risk? My K2's power, as indicated > by the internal LCD display, reaches a maximum of 15.2 watts, but > it's my understanding that it's not safe to transmit for any > length of time with the power control turned fully clockwise. I > have the KAT2 internal antenna tuner, which is supposed to make > the LCD display's power readings more accurate, but I've gotten > the impression from others that, even with the KAT2 installed, > the readings are not terribly accurate, especially at the high > end of the range. Is my impression correct? > > I believe the instruction manual warns not to set the power to a > higher level than the transmitter is capable of producing. Am I > correct in assuming that a fairly accurate external wattmeter is > required to determine whether the transmitter is failing to > deliver the requested power (with requested power indicated by > the K2's display), or is there a way to identify this state of > affairs without an external wattmeter? Alternatively, assuming > that CAL CUR is set appropriately, am I safe in cranking the > power right on up, as long as doing so doesn't cause a HI CUR warning? > > Thanks very much, 73 & 72, > Jeff > WB5GWB > Long Island, NY > K2 #821 > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.8/455 - Release Date: 9/22/2006 > > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
