> I don't know what the fascination is with "zero beating" the guy > you're calling.
Although my elmer told me of similar tales when he was starting out, he taught me that the purpose of at least "near" zero-beating was to not take up more bandwidth than necessary. You're not running a full-duplex conversation in CW, and so sharing 1 kHz or less is entirely adequate. He also taught me, however, that is was your polite obligation to tune around your transmit frequency a bit to listen for any takers who weren't quite on your frequency. 73, Mike KW1ND _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
