I rarely use NR myself so most of the time I'll stick with Don's settings. I downloaded K3_EZ and have several alternative AGC settings entered so now it's easy to change. Thanks for the input Don.
Don Wilhelm-4 wrote: > > Yes, the low slope (and perhaps the threshold) for my AGC settings > increases the apparent NR distortion. So you have to make a decision > "better" AGC response or clearer audio when using NR. > Since I rarely use NR, I have made my choice. > > It may be that someday soon we may 'have our cake and eat it too' when > Lyle works on the NR algorithms, but for now we have to make those > choices. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > NZ0T wrote: >> I should add that I recently changed my AGC settings to those suggested >> by >> Don W3FPR to make the K3 sound more like a K2: >> >> AGC PLS off >> AGC SLP 002 >> AGC THR 008 >> AGC-F 140 >> AGC-S 010 >> >> Any other AGC settings that are better? Could these settings affect the >> NR >> in a bad way? I work a lot of CW but also some SSB on 160 and that's >> where >> I noticed the NR sounding bad. . >> >> >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/NR-distortion-with-3.11-tp2860948p2868893.html Sent from the [K3] mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
