No, we're talking about sideband direction, not VFO tuning direction.

Al


On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 08:15 -0700, Bob Cunnings wrote:
> Er, hold on. you write:
> 
> > Subtract 5 MHz VFO:
> > Carrier   9.000 - 5.000 = 4.000 MHz
> > Sideband  9.001 - 5.000 = 4.001 MHz
> > ==> USB
> 
> but shouldn't it be:
> 
> Subtract 5 MHz VFO:
> Carrier   9.000 - 5.000 = 4.000 MHz
> Sideband  9.000 - 5.001 = 3.999 MHz
> ==> LSB
> 
> Since we changing the VFO, not the IF freq?
> 
> Bob NW8L
> 
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Alan Bloom <n...@cds1.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 21:06 -0800, Alan Bloom wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 18:36 -0800, wb6r...@mac.com wrote:
> >> > LSB on the lower bands and USB on the higher bands is an artifact of
> >> > the mixing scheme, from the early days of SSB, of a 9 Mc IF mixed with
> >> > a 5.0 - 5.5 Mc VFO. (Yes, it was Mc in those days, not MHz.) Add and
> >> > you get 20m. Subtract and you get 80m. The subtraction results in
> >> > sideband reversal and so LSB became the "standard" for 80m. There is
> >> > really no reason now to not to just operate USB on all bands other
> >> > than tradition.
> >>
> >> I've heard people say that many times over the years but clearly it's
> >> not true.  A 9 MHz IF set up for (let's say) USB will still be USB no
> >> matter whether you add or subtract the 5-5.5 MHz VFO.
> >
> > I just did a little Googling on the Internet (AC6V.com and elsewhere)
> > and discovered to my astonishment that this is an actual bona-fide
> > controversial subject among radio amateurs.  Despite the fact that a
> > simple 2-minute back-of-the-envelope calculation is all it takes to
> > disprove the myth.  For the record:
> >
> > Intermediate frequency:
> > Carrier   9.000 MHz
> > Sideband  9.001 MHz
> > ==> USB
> >
> > Add 5 MHz VFO:
> > Carrier   9.000 + 5.000 = 14.000 MHz
> > Sideband  9.001 + 5.000 = 14.001 MHz
> > ==> USB
> >
> > Subtract 5 MHz VFO:
> > Carrier   9.000 - 5.000 = 4.000 MHz
> > Sideband  9.001 - 5.000 = 4.001 MHz
> > ==> USB
> >
> > I can't believe people are actually arguing about this!
> >
> > Al N1AL
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > Elecraft mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to