Yes you are absolutely right,all companies should use the same circuit design or even improve it further more but its hard to believe that a company that has been sleeping in the darkness in regards to receiver performance sudenly has woke up,like I said,I don't know who is that Radcom or what,I will trust only when I see the performance checked by Sherwood labs and if it is the truth well then we have to congratulate Yaesu. AD4C
"For a refined ham it is compulsory to own a k3" --- On Sat, 5/22/10, Bob Cunnings <bob.cunni...@gmail.com> wrote: From: Bob Cunnings <bob.cunni...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] FT5000 review in Radcom To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Date: Saturday, May 22, 2010, 3:14 PM On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Hector Padron <ad4c2...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Third in place ??? I will not believe it until I see the performance reports > from Sherwood labs. > > AD4C > Why not? I wouldn't be surprised to see incremental improvement in this area, now that it is finally receiving the attention it deserves. Contesters should be happy that more manufacturers are heeding the call to produce properly designed down conversion receivers in the mold of Orion, and K3. Choice is good. Bob NW8L ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
