Based on W3NQN's filters and rated for 200W. Makes sense on the teflon insulator... I assume that that only makes the difference when doing higher power? I do think that whenever I'm making an antenna that is to have a connector blow torch soldered to a copper pipe or something I'm going to buy one of those! Now I just wonder what the difference in the small price jump delta between RFX and non RFX is...
~Brett (N7MG) On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Bob Naumann <w...@w5ov.com> wrote: > The 83-798A has a Teflon insulator - this is what makes it different. > > They're all equivalent for low frequency, low power (<200w) work which I > presume your bandpass filters will be. > > "High-End"? What design? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net > [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Brett Howard > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 8:22 AM > To: elecraft > Subject: [Elecraft] SO-239 Connector Selection > > Ok figured I'd ask here and see if someone had some input on the > differences here. Hopefully someone has done more design with these > than I... > > My application is that I'm looking for connectors to install on some > high end home made band-pass filters. > > 83-1R; > http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Amphenol-RF/83-1R-SO-239/?qs=sGAEpiMZZMt > qi3rrGzC6kucWGwVoNS6TyriIimuNw9A%3d > 83-1R-RFX: > http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Amphenol-RF/83-1R-RFX/?qs=sGAEpiMZZMtqi3 > rrGzC6kqBNVAfbUIcAaUNmqqZ3zpA%3d > 83-798: > http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Amphenol-RF/83-798/?qs=sGAEpiMZZMtqi3rrG > zC6kptFUq3vT%252bWoMcHyGEmWyaU%3d > > The 83-1R is a number I've seen a lot in usage and its the connector I'm > leaning toward. It is also the cheapest of the 3. I know they are all > going to be good connectors but is there any benefit to going with the > other two versions? I believe that the RFX version is a commercial > version of the same thing (at only 20 cents more) but I don't know what > the difference is. Finally the 83-798 claims to be an SO-239A > connector... I tried doing a search for SO-239 vs SO-239A and in a > quick gander didn't turn up much... Any input would be appreciated. > > Thanks > > ~Brett (N7MG) > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
