On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:55:41 -0500 Eric Gorr wrote:
On Jan 27, 2004, at 5:26 AM, Anthony Duff wrote:
I suggest that a definition of the condorcet election method being publicly proposed should be explicit about the full pairwise analysis, and that the possibility of a circular tie, and the resolution of such a circular tie should be treated like a footnote.
Have you read my description of the method found at:
http://www.ericgorr.net/condorcet/rankedpairs/
How would you modify it to make it better?
Wording seemed tortured.
What wording?
Help me understand how the 75 migrated from B/C to A/B.
oops. Thanks for catching that. Example #2 corrected.
---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
