Eric Gorr wrote: > I am sure others are aware of this data, but I just got my hands on > it and spent some time analyzing it with single winner methods. > Apparently in Dr. Tideman's research into voting methods, he was able > to obtain many (86) ranked ballots from elections held in England.
I don't know how it will affect your analyses (but I think it will), but you should be aware that some of the ballots in the dataset Tideman obtained from the UK (not just elections in England) may have been for STV-PR multi-member elections, not single-winner elections. All were preferential vote elections, with no equality of preferences. It MAY not affect the conclusions of the single-winner analyses you wish to do, but voters do vote differently in single-member elections and multi-member elections where some parties put up more than one candidate. If these ballots come from the dataset I think they do, much of those data were machine-generated (reconstructed) from election result sheets, ie they are not actual voters' ballots. James ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
