James G-A wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> Aren't all the voting methods we've been promoting >> both anonymous and neutral? Doesn't that mean >> none of them are entirely non-random? >> >> 50%: A > B >> 50%: B > A > > Actually, I might prefer voting methods which report > a tie in this situation, and do not chose between A > and B. Hence there is no random element.
I don't believe the public will be willing to discard the resoluteness (a.k.a. "single-winner") criterion. --Steve ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
