hi James, thanks for the reply. comments below.
> ER-IRV(whole) is more of an IRV-approval "hybrid", and does a better job > of reducing the incentive for the compromising-reversal strategy, but > ER-IRV(fractional) is probably more acceptable to the general public, and > less likely to anger people who are very strict in their definition of > "one person, one vote". could you explain the details of how ER-IRV (whole and fractional) are tabulated? I searched the list, and found a few posts about ER-IRV from this spring/summer (including your humorous June 7 post), but none of them describe the method in detail. thanks -- James ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
