MIKE OSSIPOFF nkklrp-at-hotmail.com |EMlist| wrote:

I realize that people aren't interested in these postings in which Russ posts his astonishingly ignorance and I try to help him understand what he's talking about. There' s no reason why his education should take

Mike, I have a Master's Degree in engineering from Stanford. And what is your level of academic accomplishment, Mike? Did you finish High School? And what do you do for a living, Mike? Is posting on this list your only, or most important, job? Yet you have the audacity to talk like that about me. You are delusional, Mike. Who do you think you are fooling? I doubt you are fooling anyone but yourself. But then, unlike you, I can't read everyone else's mind.


Yes, I did bring up 9/11, but it was only in reply to your dishonest post in which you lied about why you decided not to work with me anymore on ElectionMethods.org. That was the post in which you pulled that stuff out of your rear end about my reworded definitions on the site. You are a pathetic character, Mike. I'm sorry I had the misfortune to associate with you. What a mistake that was.

By the way, I'd like to tell the folks here a little story about Mike. Occasionally we would get queries at the website, and Mike would often write incredibly long replies to them. A while back some kid, a third-grader I think, sent a one-sentence email message asing for some information for a report or something. Mike wrote a reply that must have been four or five pages long, regurgitating everything he knows about voting systems. At the end of it, he informed the poor child that more "installments" were on the way. He sent another "installment," but I finally told him to give it a rest. I don't think we ever heard back from the child, or if we did it was some very terse reply.

Russ continued:

He believes that the WTC had explosives installed that
were wired to detonate on cue to collapse the buildings.

I reply:

Again, Russ is repeating that for the 3rd time, at least. I said that the collapse wasn't consistent with the media's fire explanation, but was consistent with ordinary explosive demolition. Check Griffin's book, &/or the other links and sources that I posted on that and the general 9/11 topic.

Did you read the links that I sent a few days ago, Mike. They had major studies and explanations, by professional structural engineers, of how and why the WTC collapsed. Did you read them, you moron? They said nothing whatsoever about "explosive demolition." By the way, "Griffin" is a theologian, folks. You live in a sad little fantasy world, Mike. I'm just trying to inform the folks on this list of the looney-tune they're dealing with.


By the way, did you check the length of Mikes reply to my message? Did anyone read it? Well, I just realized that I'm letting his lunacy get to me. Maybe I should have realized that sooner, but better late than never. If I don't nip it in the bud, I could go crazy too. If I keep debating Mike, I could become a fruitcake like him. I'm dropping it here so I have a chance of staying sane.

Let me just say that there's no way I could put into words how much Mike disgusts me with his delusions, lies, and mental illness. He spits in the face of the men and woman who defend the very freedom that entitles him to spout his brain-dead views. He promulgates sick ideas about his own nation, a nation that has provided him with the freedom and the technology to espouse his sick ideas. He belongs in Saddam's Iraq, which he thinks wasn't so bad. My life and reputation are diminished for ever having associated with him.

----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to