Most of the proposed Approval/Condorcet Compromises assume that the CW is more desirable than the Approval Winner when they are not the same candidate, i.e. the Approval Winner is only to be considered when there is no CW available.

That seems to me like a kind of one sided approach to "compromise."

A less biased approach that puts these two on an equal footing should respect the following principle:


Both the CW and the Approval Winner should have reasonable chances of winning.


Here's my current favorite among such methods:

Use random ballot among candidates that have beat paths to the Approval Winner.

Forest



----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to