election-methods-list  

Messages by Date

• 2002/08/16 RE: [EM] pairwise, fairness, and information content James Gilmour
• 2002/08/16 [EM] TIMESHARE officeholding Joe Weinstein
• 2002/08/16 [EM] D'Hondt without lists Olli Salmi
• 2002/08/16 Re: [EM] pairwise, fairness, and information content Alex Small
• 2002/08/16 Re: [EM] pairwise, fairness, and information content Craig Carey
• 2002/08/16 Re: [EM] pairwise, fairness, and information content Craig Carey
• 2002/08/15 Re: [EM] pairwise, fairness, and information content Richard Moore
• 2002/08/15 [EM] Simple Question Alex Small
• 2002/08/15 Re: [EM] pairwise, fairness, and information content Craig Carey
• 2002/08/15 Re: [EM] pairwise, fairness, and information content Craig Carey
• 2002/08/14 [EM] pairwise, fairness, and information content Richard Moore
• 2002/08/12 [EM] She underlined the single word, "Eskimo." Narins, Josh
• 2002/08/11 Re: [EM] Much Ado About Not Quite Nothing Dave Ketchum
• 2002/08/11 Re: [EM] MCA in use Adam Tarr
• 2002/08/11 Re: [EM] Much Ado About Not Quite Nothing Alex Small
• 2002/08/10 Re: [EM] Much Ado About Not Quite Nothing Craig Carey
• 2002/08/09 [EM] Much Ado About Not Quite Nothing Alex Small
• 2002/08/09 Approval variant MCA used in a parish (Re: [EM] MCA in use Craig Carey
• 2002/08/09 Re: [EM] Approval is flawed (write D. Davison) Dave Ketchum
• 2002/08/09 [EM] MCA in use Joe Weinstein
• 2002/08/09 RE: [EM] Approval is flawed (write D. Davison) Narins, Josh
• 2002/08/09 Re: [EM] Raw Deal for Mayors, more unfairness than improvement Craig Carey
• 2002/08/08 Re: [EM] Raw Deal for Mayors, more unfairness than improvement Bart Ingles
• 2002/08/03 Re: [EM] Decision juries - notes and responses Joe Weinstein
• 2002/08/03 Re: [EM] Decision juries - notes and responses Craig Carey
• 2002/08/03 Re: [EM] Decision juries - notes and responses Peter Maxwell
• 2002/08/02 RE: [EM] Decision juries - notes and responses Joe Weinstein
• 2002/08/02 [EM] Steph: Objectivity, relevance, equilibriumj MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/08/02 RE: [EM] Seized by an idea - my changed views Narins, Josh
• 2002/08/02 Re: [EM] One Man One Vote in equation form; Power and rejecting Approval Craig Carey
• 2002/08/01 Re: [EM] One Man One Vote in equation form; Power and rejectingApproval Richard Moore
• 2002/08/01 Re: [EM] Reply to Weinstein on Approval in Long Beach Joe Weinstein
• 2002/08/01 Re: [EM] One Man One Vote in equation form; Power and rejecting Approval Craig Carey
• 2002/08/01 [EM] Decision juries - notes and responses Joe Weinstein
• 2002/08/01 [EM] Reply to Weinstein on Approval in Long Beach Craig Carey
• 2002/08/01 Re: [EM] Seized by an idea - my changed views Dave Ketchum
• 2002/07/31 Re: [EM] One Man One Vote in equation form; Power and rejecting Approval Richard Moore
• 2002/07/31 Re: [EM] Seized by an idea - my changed views Forest Simmons
• 2002/07/31 Re: [EM] IRV letter in the San Jose Mercury Joe Weinstein
• 2002/07/31 Re: [EM] IRV letter in the San Jose Mercury Alex Small
• 2002/07/31 Re: [EM] IRV letter in the San Jose Mercury rmoore4
• 2002/07/30 [EM] One Man One Vote in equation form; Power and rejecting Approval Craig Carey
• 2002/07/30 [EM] IRV letter in the San Jose Mercury Bart Ingles
• 2002/07/30 Re: [EM] wv & margins definitions & difference Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/07/30 [EM] 'Rights' -side up Joe Weinstein
• 2002/07/30 RE: What are we all about?, etc. Narins, Josh
• 2002/07/29 [EM] Election law summit Jurij Toplak
• 2002/07/29 RE: [EM] Seized by an idea - my changed views James Gilmour
• 2002/07/28 Re: [EM] Seized by an idea - my changed views Joe Weinstein
• 2002/07/28 Re: [EM] Seized by an idea - my changed views Bart Ingles
• 2002/07/28 Re: One man, one vote and Approval: Pragmatic Approach Rob LeGrand
• 2002/07/28 RE: [EM] Seized by an idea - my changed views James Gilmour
• 2002/07/28 [EM] Seized by an idea - my changed views Joe Weinstein
• 2002/07/27 Approval in Texas: they want it (utility) (was Re: [EM] One man, one vote and Approval: Pragmatic Approach Craig Carey
• 2002/07/27 Re: [EM] One man, one vote and Approval: Pragmatic Approach Bart Ingles
• 2002/07/27 Re: [EM] One man, one vote and Approval: Pragmatic Approach Rob LeGrand
• 2002/07/27 Re: [EM] One man, one vote and Approval: Pragmatic Approach Craig Carey
• 2002/07/27 [EM] One man, one vote and Approval: Pragmatic Approach Alex Small
• 2002/07/27 [EM] Approval: One Man One Vote: fails or passes[?] (was Re: What are we all about? Craig Carey
• 2002/07/26 Re: [EM] Two Theorems: Please criticize or point out errors Craig Carey
• 2002/07/26 Re: [EM] Two Theorems: Please criticize or point out errors Alex Small
• 2002/07/26 [EM] Two Theorems: Please criticize or point out errors Alex Small
• 2002/07/26 Re: [EM] EM Advisory Council Forest Simmons
• 2002/07/25 Re: [EM] EM Advisory Council Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/07/25 [EM] EM Advisory Council Forest Simmons
• 2002/07/25 Re: [EM] What are we all about? Joe Weinstein
• 2002/07/25 [EM] Voting Machine Accuracy and Capacity Dave Ketchum
• 2002/07/25 RE: What are we all about? Narins, Josh
• 2002/07/25 Re: What are we all about? Bart Ingles
• 2002/07/24 RE: What are we all about? James Gilmour
• 2002/07/24 RE: What are we all about? Joe Weinstein
• 2002/07/23 RE: What are we all about? James Gilmour
• 2002/07/23 RE: [EM] What are we all about? Narins, Josh
• 2002/07/23 Re: [EM] What are we all about? Alex Small
• 2002/07/23 Re: What are we all about? Rob LeGrand
• 2002/07/23 Re: [EM] What are we all about? Forest Simmons
• 2002/07/23 [EM] What are we all about? Douglas Greene
• 2002/07/18 RE: [EM] Approval Strategy for the Average Citizen Joe Weinstein
• 2002/07/18 Re: [EM] Approval Strategy for the Average Citizen Joseph Malkevitch
• 2002/07/18 RE: [EM] Approval Strategy for the Average Citizen Alex Small
• 2002/07/18 RE: [EM] Approval Strategy for the Average Citizen Forest Simmons
• 2002/07/17 [EM] To Josh, re: coin-tossing MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/07/17 Re: [EM] Approval Strategy for the Average Citizen Bart Ingles
• 2002/07/17 RE: [EM] Approval Strategy for the Average Citizen Joe Weinstein
• 2002/07/17 RE: [EM] Approval Strategy for the Average Citizen Narins, Josh
• 2002/07/16 [EM] Approval Strategy for the Average Citizen Forest Simmons
• 2002/07/14 [EM] Another alternative to Tideman's estimating method MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/07/10 [EM] R.I.P. SVM? Alex Small
• 2002/07/10 [EM] Compromise/Composite of votes &margins for Schulze Method Stephanie Finney
• 2002/07/09 Re: Nash equilibrium for voting? Richard Moore
• 2002/07/08 Re: [EM] Nash equilibrium for voting? Alex Small
• 2002/07/07 [EM] Nash equilibrium for voting? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/07/05 [EM] Correction to SVM and Strong FBC Alex Small
• 2002/07/05 [EM] Strong FBC and the SVM Alex Small
• 2002/07/02 [EM] Dave Ketchum reply, part 3 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/07/02 Re: [EM] Dave Ketchum reply, part 1 Forest Simmons
• 2002/07/02 RE: [EM] Cyclic Ambiguities = misinformed voters? (was: The True Majority Ghost) Tarr, Adam
• 2002/07/01 [EM] IRV completed pairwise-count example MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/07/01 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion vs. Condorcet Efficiency Bart Ingles
• 2002/07/01 [EM] Condorcet Criterion vs. Condorcet Efficiency Alex Small
• 2002/07/01 RE: [EM] Cyclic Ambiguities = misinformed voters? (was: The True Majority Ghost) Alex Small
• 2002/07/01 RE: [EM] Cyclic Ambiguities = misinformed voters? (was: The True Majority Ghost) Tarr, Adam
• 2002/06/30 [EM] Dave Ketchum reply, part 2 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/06/29 [EM] Cyclic Ambiguities = misinformed voters? (was: The True Majority Ghost) Alex Small
• 2002/06/29 [EM] Fwd: Re: Approval vote Rob LeGrand
• 2002/06/29 [EM] 06/29/02 - The True Majority Ghost: Donald E Davison
• 2002/06/28 [EM] Dave Ketchum reply, part 1 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/06/25 Re: Saari reply Forest Simmons
• 2002/06/25 Re: [EM] 06/24/02 - The 'true majority winner' Alex Small
• 2002/06/25 [EM] 06/24/02 - The "true majority winner" Donald E Davison
• 2002/06/24 RE: [EM] Saari reply Blake Cretney
• 2002/06/23 RE: [EM] Saari reply Blake Cretney
• 2002/06/22 Re: Saari reply Dave Ketchum
• 2002/06/22 Re: Saari reply Alex Small
• 2002/06/22 Re: Saari reply Dave Ketchum
• 2002/06/22 Re: Saari reply Bart Ingles
• 2002/06/22 Re: Saari reply Dave Ketchum
• 2002/06/21 Re: Saari reply MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/06/21 Re: [EM] Saari reply Joe Weinstein
• 2002/06/21 Re: [EM] 06/21/02 - `Majority' is not a valid word on the EM list: Dave Ketchum
• 2002/06/21 [EM] 06/21/02 - `Majority' is not a valid word on the EM list: Donald E Davison
• 2002/06/20 [EM] Request for criticism Rob LeGrand
• 2002/06/20 Re: [EM] Saari reply Alex Small
• 2002/06/20 Re: [EM] Saari reply Dave Ketchum
• 2002/06/18 Re: [EM] 06/16/02 - Let's `Sort-Out' the Candidates: Michael Rouse
• 2002/06/18 Re: Carey Diagrams Rob LeGrand
• 2002/06/18 RE: [EM] 06/16/02 - Let's `Sort-Out' the Candidates: Narins, Josh
• 2002/06/16 [EM] 06/16/02 - Let's `Sort-Out' the Candidates: Donald E Davison
• 2002/06/13 Re: [EM] Intriguing proposal & musings on strategy and autonomy Michael Rouse
• 2002/06/13 [EM] 06/13/02 - FWD - From: [email protected] Wed Jun 12 17:01:21 2002: Donald E Davison
• 2002/06/13 [EM] Intriguing proposal & musings on strategy and autonomy Alex Small
• 2002/06/11 Re: [EM] 06/11/02 - FWD of Mike Saari's letter: Michael Rouse
• 2002/06/11 [EM] Loya Jirga Joe Weinstein
• 2002/06/11 [EM] [OT] Loya Jirga To Elect New President of Afghanistan! Narins, Josh
• 2002/06/11 [EM] 06/11/02 - FWD of Mike Saari's letter: Donald E Davison
• 2002/06/10 [EM] SPAM Narins, Josh
• 2002/06/07 [EM] wv & margins definitions & difference MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/06/07 Re: Winning votes Intuitive? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/06/05 Re: [EM] Winning-votes intuitive? Blake Cretney
• 2002/06/05 RE:_[EM]_unsatisfied_with_implications_of_Condorcet_method Forest Simmons
• 2002/06/05 [EM] winning votes vs margins... Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/06/05 RE: [EM] unsatisfied with implications of Condorcet method (fwd Alex Small
• 2002/06/05 RE: [EM] unsatisfied with implications of Condorcet method (fwd) Narins, Josh
• 2002/06/04 [EM] The Condorcet question MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/06/03 RE: [EM] The billiard ball theory of voting Forest Simmons
• 2002/06/03 RE: [EM] The billiard ball theory of voting Narins, Josh
• 2002/06/02 Re: unsatisfied with implications of Condorcet method (fwd) Rob Lanphier
• 2002/06/02 [EM] unsatisfied with implications of Condorcet method (fwd) Rob Lanphier
• 2002/06/01 Re: Billiard-Ball Theory of Voting MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/06/01 Re: [EM] The billiard ball theory of voting Forest Simmons
• 2002/06/01 Re: [EM] The billiard ball theory of voting Alex Small
• 2002/05/31 [EM] The billiard ball theory of voting Forest Simmons
• 2002/05/29 [EM] Strategic values, not weights Richard Moore
• 2002/05/28 Re: [EM] 1-seat Cumulative isn't FPTP? Richard Moore
• 2002/05/28 RE: [EM] 2-step CR: A proposal Olli Salmi
• 2002/05/28 [EM] Relative Margins MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/05/28 Re: [EM] The Small Voting Machine (was Strong FBC) Forest Simmons
• 2002/05/28 RE: [EM] 2-step CR: A proposal Olli Salmi
• 2002/05/24 [EM] ESD Candidates update Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/05/24 Re: [EM] The Small Voting Machine (was Strong FBC) Forest Simmons
• 2002/05/23 Re: [EM] The Small Voting Machine (was Strong FBC Richard Moore
• 2002/05/23 RE: [EM] 2-step CR: A proposal Tarr, Adam
• 2002/05/22 Re: [EM] 2-step CR: A proposal Forest Simmons
• 2002/05/22 Re: [EM] 2-step CR: A proposal Richard Moore
• 2002/05/22 Re: [EM] 2-step CR: A proposal Joe Weinstein
• 2002/05/22 Re: [EM] 2-step CR: A proposal Alex Small
• 2002/05/22 Re: [EM] The Small Voting Machine (was Strong FBC) Forest Simmons
• 2002/05/22 Re: [EM] 2-step CR: A proposal Forest Simmons
• 2002/05/22 [EM] 2-step CR: A proposal Alex Small
• 2002/05/22 RE: [EM] 05/23/02 - Single-Seat Cumulative is not FPTP: Narins, Josh
• 2002/05/22 [EM] 05/23/02 - Single-Seat Cumulative is not FPTP: Donald Davison
• 2002/05/22 [EM] 05/21/02 - FWD Math for those who want more Math: Donald Davison
• 2002/05/22 [EM] Relative margin definition and example Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/05/21 Re: [EM] Question on Condorcet/Kemeny order Joseph Malkevitch
• 2002/05/21 Re: [EM] Question on Condorcet/Kemeny order Joseph Malkevitch
• 2002/05/20 [EM] Question on Condorcet/Kemeny order Michael Rouse
• 2002/05/20 Re: [EM] 05/16/02 - More Code Words: Richard Moore
• 2002/05/20 [EM] Meaning clarification MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/05/20 Re: [EM] Why RP(wv) & CSSD meet GSFC MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/05/20 Re: [EM] Why RP(wv) & CSSD meet GSFC Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/05/20 RE: [EM] 05/15/02 - Josh calls for more math: Joe Weinstein
• 2002/05/20 [EM] Alternative Vote (or IRV) using residual approval weights Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/05/20 RE: [EM] 05/16/02 - More Code Words: Narins, Josh
• 2002/05/20 Re: [EM] 05/20/02 - True Majority Winner or Candidate: Michael Rouse
• 2002/05/20 [EM] 05/20/02 - True Majority Winner or Candidate: Donald Davison
• 2002/05/20 [EM] 05/20/02 - What `is' is (a la Clinton): Donald Davison
• 2002/05/18 [EM] IRV strategy correction MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/05/18 [EM] IRV strategy? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/05/18 [EM] 05/18/02 - Rank Your Lowest Poll Favorite as Number One: Donald Davison
• 2002/05/16 Re: [EM] 05/16/02 - More Code Words: Michael Rouse
• 2002/05/16 Re: [EM] 05/16/02 - More Code Words: richard moore
• 2002/05/16 [EM] Multiple-winners contest n.2 and next Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/05/16 Re: [EM] 05/16/02 - More Code Words: Michael Rouse
• 2002/05/16 [EM] 05/16/02 - More Code Words: Donald Davison
• 2002/05/15 Re: [EM] 05/13/02 - The Education of Poor Richard: Richard Moore
• 2002/05/15 Re: [EM] 05/13/02 - The Education of Poor Richard: Richard Moore
• 2002/05/15 Re: [EM] 05/15/02 - Josh calls for more math: richard moore
• 2002/05/15 [EM] Carey Diagrams Forest Simmons
• 2002/05/15 Re: Re: [EM] 05/15/02 - Josh calls for more math: Forest Simmons
• 2002/05/15 Re: [EM] Poor Richard's Education Forest Simmons

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]