Regarding Mr. Ossipoff's comments of Wed, Jun 24, 1998 7:09 PM EDT--- Demorep1 (not Marcus Schulze) wrote--> > If initial conditions change (i.e. by adding more voters with different rankings), then the results can be expected to change. Demorep1 also says-- How about having each voter vote a *sincere* ballot and an *insincere* ballot (depending on which tiebreaker method is to be used with its obvious or not so obvious defects that violate one or more criteria) ?
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. DEMOREP1
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. DEMOREP1
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. DEMOREP1
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. DEMOREP1
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. David Marsay