On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, David Catchpole wrote:
> > >> At 15:04 15.10.99 , David Catchpole wrote:
> > >> >The statement of (P1) is thus-
> > >> >
> > >> >"No change in ballots which does not effect preferences between the winner
> > >> >and other candidates should not change the outcome"
> > >>
> > >> The above may have drafting errors in it.
>
> Well, yeah, on second thoughts it does have a double negative in there.
>
> Replace the first "No" with "Any".
Well, that's OK. I was flustered and in a hurry, however, when I wrote
this message immediately below-
> Consider the amended version in something approximating your algebra,
> later on in this message.
That's the amended version of monotonicity, not "(P1)." Woops.
I'm going to send a consolidated message that starts from the beginning
again and doesn't make the mistakes like that (albeit immediately below it
there was a correct definition of my understanding of (P1)) and hopefully
doesn't baffle and anger Craig.
