Re: Condorcet Truncation Example

[Saari]

In a message dated 97-05-10 21:57:51 EDT, you write:

>I think Arrow did show that there's no such thing as the "perfect" method,
>so we should stop trying for that.

I interpret Arrow's proof to show that there is no perfect *preferential
voting* method.  Other methods (such as rated voting) fall outside the scope
of his proof.

Mike Saari