At 03:38 PM 10/16/98 EDT, you wrote: >Secrecy can be violated with the current simple X voting method if there are >multiple offices on the ballot. The corrupted voter would vote for the false >choice for an important office/issue along with some obscure combination (such >as for judicial candidates who have no chance of winning against an incumbent >judge). While this is true it takes ten offices to sign the ballot in a typical precinct with X voting and only one with ranked voting.
- Ranking can violate secrecy. Charles Fiterman
- Re: Ranking can violate secrecy. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Ranking can violate secrecy. Bart Ingles
- Re: Ranking can violate secrecy. David Marsay
- Re: Ranking can violate secrecy. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Ranking can violate secrecy. DEMOREP1
- Charles Fiterman