>> From: Forest Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: [EM] Maximum Consent
>> Although a preference ballot may have a greater quantity
>> of information, the Approval ballot has the most relevant
>> information for consent of the governed: i.e. which
>> candidates could the voter willingly give consent to.
As may have been mentioned here once or twice, most of the
information in an IRV ballot never gets used. Actual
quantity of info used in round 1 is same as FPTP -- minimal.
Little is added in each subsequent round. In fact, the
strategy -- transferring the votes of the last place
candidate, and therefore transferring the fewest votes --
adds as little new information as possible. It seems that
the guiding principle in IRV is to minimize the amount of
information actually used. Strange, since the ballot itself
contains much more info than Approval.
