Mr. Cretney wrote in part-
Theory doesn't necessarily mean debatable. My point was that we've expanded the issue under discussion. The old theory only considered preference orders and methods based on them. We need a new theory to talk about what's going on in people's heads, and how that is reflected in sincere ballot ---- D- Yet another different posting. I must be living in the New Age of Politics (NAP). What next-- lie detectors for each voter to detect those naughty/ evil insincere votes ??? Even first choice votes (plus any later choice votes, of course) may be *insincere* if 1 or more of the choices is rotten in the mind of the voter.