Yup. http://betterpolls.com/et?vrr=-clist&if=-d&cand=4&seats=1&data=F%3ES%3EP%3DB%0D%0AP%3EB%3EF%3DS%0D%0AS%3EP%3EF%3DB%0D%0AP%3ES%3EF%3DB%0D%0AF%3ES%3EP%3DB%0D%0AF%3DS%3DP%3DB
6 votes is a kinda small sample (5 really, a=b=c=d is pretty much abstention). On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Just got this via my Condorcet Calculator (http://condorcet.ericgorr.net) and > thought others would be interested. All Condorcet methods picked the same > winner. All IRV methods picked the same winner. The winners of Condorcet and > IRV methods were different. > > ---- here's the info I got: > > My book club, scifemme, sometimes uses condorcet voting to determine which > book > to read next. The long name is "Ladies Scientific Discussion Group and Tea > Party"; we started doing this after we read _Wisdom of the Crowds_ by James > Surowiecki. (The book doesn't mention the method, but I knew of it and > proposed it at that time.) > > Each letter represents a book under consideration to be read next. (F = > Surely > You're Joking, Mr Feynman, P = Visual Piety, B = Borderlands Science, S = > Stiff) > > F>S>P=B > P>B>F=S > S>P>F=B > P>S>F=B > F>S>P=B > F=S=P=B > ---- > election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info > Brian Olson http://bolson.org/ ---- election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info