Dear Forest Simmons, you wrote (30 Dec 2006):
> Here's a version that is both clone proof and monotonic: > > The winner is the alternative A with the smallest number > of ballots on which alternatives that beat A pairwise are > ranked in first place. [shared first place slots are counted > fractionally] I would say that this method is vulnerable to crowding. Please demonstrate that this method is cloneproof. Markus Schulze ---- election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
