--- Jonathan Lundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > On Dec 18, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Juho wrote: > > > No parties > > + less hidden cabinet decisions > > + free opinions > > + also minority opinions present > > +/- less group power (coordinated voting according to majority > > opinion of the party) > > - more populism > > - candidates may tell different stories to different potential voters > > - different stories in different elections > > + more populism > > To quote my local dictionary (Oxford American), > > populist > > a member or adherent of a political party seeking to represent the > interests of ordinary people. > > a person who holds, or who is concerned with, the views of ordinary > people.
It's not obvious to me that no parties would lead to more populism anyway. In countries with weak party systems, are successful platforms more likely to be populist? Kevin Venzke _____________________________________________________________________________ Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail http://mail.yahoo.fr ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info