n Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Kathy Dopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rob, > > I noticed that you did not try to answer one of my sincere questions > to you (I am a highly skilled teacher whose college classes always had > the highest score of all the classes taught by all the professors and > other TA's on any department-wide final mathematics exams. I did this > by questioning my classes and making them think, although some > students reacted antagonistically by being forced to learn to think > rather than being able to simply memorize.) > > Your entire email (below) disparaged me personally and > mischaracterized me rather than trying to honestly communicate on the > issue, so I will waste no more time or effort trying to teach you how > to think logically about the issues concerning how to or why to assure > the accuracy of election outcomes. > Give me a break.....you do the exact same things you accuse me of. Mischaracterize? Where? I advocate a balanced perspective on things, and when I do, you constantly use the straw man of "so you are saying its fraud is ok" when I did nothing of the kind. I didn't address your issues in the last message because they are more of the same, and I have already addressed them (and I don't have an infinite amount of time). And I get tired of your habit of ridiculing anyone who doesn't agree with you, then crying "personal attack" as soon as they argue back.
---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info