Dear Paul Kislanko, you wrote (10 Jan 2009):
> The second scenario is > > > 26 A>B > > 25 B>A > > 49 C > > 5 A > > I ask again, in the post I replied to, it was claimed > mutual majority selected (A,B,C) in the 2nd case. I > wondered how that was possible, and you agree that it > isn't. Kevin Venzke wrote: "Mutual Majority elects {A,B,C}." I wrote: "Mutual majority says nothing in the scenario above." There is no contradiction between Kevin Venzke and me. When the set of candidates is {A,B,C}, then saying that the winner is chosen from {A,B,C} (Kevin Venzke) is the same as saying that mutual majority says nothing (Markus Schulze). Markus Schulze ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info