On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Markus Schulze <markus.schu...@alumni.tu-berlin.de> wrote: > I recommend: > > --the president is the top-ranked candidate of the Schulze > single-winner ranking, > --the vice president is the second-ranked candidate of the > Schulze single-winner ranking, > --the other members of the council are chosen by the Schulze > proportional ranking method so that proportionality is > maximized.
For the rest of the council, I think electing them using Sculze-STV with the restriction that only results where the President and VP are members are allowed would give better proportionality. My understanding of how the ranking system works is 1) Elect Schulze winner 2) Elect 2 member council with Schulze-STV subject to winner in 1) being present 3) Elect 3 member council with Schulze-STV subject to winners in 1,2) being present 4) Continue with process until all seats filled. One new member is elected to council in each step. So, the process would be modified to 1) Elect Schulze winner as President 2) Elect Schulze 2nd place candidate as VP 3) Elect 8 member council subject to President and VP being members This gets Centerist President and VP and also maximises proportionality. It also assumes all the other councilors are equal in standing. ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
