I noticed that there was a lot of activity on the multi-winner side. Earlier I have even complained about the lack of interest in multi-winner methods. Now there are still some interesting but unread mails in my inbox.
Multi-winner methods are, if possible, even more complicated than single-winner methods. Maybe one reason behind the record is that there are still so many uncovered (in this word's regular non-EM English meaning) candidates to cover. Juho On 3.8.2011, at 3.48, fsimm...@pcc.edu wrote: > Towards the end of July, I noticed that I had to scroll down a long ways in > the archive to get to the most > recent messages. > > I wonder if we set some kind of record. > > If we were approaching or receding from a major election, it would be more > understandable. > > Maybe all of the feisty guys are getting too tame, so nothing gets censored. > > Maybe Rob is getting lax on filtering out the stuff that doesn't have Nobel > prize potential :) > > > ---- > Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
