Can you give a specific example where ICT fails the conventional CC, and your argument why that isn't "meaningful"? The words below don't add up to anything for me, so I think I need a concrete example.
Jameson 2012/7/29 Michael Ossipoff <email9648...@gmail.com> > Suppose you rank X and Y both in 1st place. > > You do so because you prefer that X or Y wins. > > If (in un-improved Condorcet) X beats Y, thereby giving the win to > someone you like much less than X and Y, you won't like that. > > You'd prefer that that not happen. > > In ICT, your equal top-ranking of X and Y counts as your use of your > voting power toward keeping X and Y from beating eachother. > > ICT counts equal top-rankings more in keeping with your wishes. > > When the verb "beat" is defined consistent with your wishes when you > equal-top rank X and Y, and when your equal top ranking is interpreted > as you'd like it to be, then ICT doesn't violate Condorcet's > Criterion, and Condorcet's Criterion is not incompatible with FBC. > > For the same reason, IC-Smith-T, IC-Schwartz-T, Double-Ended > IC-Smith-T, and Double-Ended IC-Schwartz-T meet the Smith Criterion > and Condorcet-Loser. > > Mike Ossipoff > ---- > Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info >
---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info