Good Afternoon, Michael

In response to your July 29th post on a different thread:

re: "I guess we can safely assume that reforms (whatever they
     are) will not begin with the official electoral process.
     It is too difficult to change and too easy to circumvent.
     What matters is the selection of candidates, namely the
     primary electoral process.  Right?"

Yes, we are discussing a possible method of selecting candidates. We arrived at this particular idea by assuming that parties still operate in more or less the same way they do today, but that everyone has the right to nominate candidates for public office - party members within parties and unrepresented people (in the 'party' sense) as a separate group.


re: "Consider a point in the future at which there are five main
     primary processes in operation at varying levels of turnout,
     with at least two being reformed processes (your choice
     which)."

            Process  Turnout
            -------  -------
               P       20 %
               Q       15        (at least two are
               R        5        reformed processes)
               S        2
               T        1

     Is this expectation more-or-less reasonable?  Anyone?

Please help me with this one. Are P-Q-R-S-T separate groups (parties?), each with members making nominations? When you say "at least two are reformed processes, are you speaking of groups with open nominations? Are the percentages the percent of the groups' membership or of the entire electorate?


re: "When you speak (Fred) of controlling the time at which
     'candidates are announced', do you mean only for the process
     that you and Juho are mooting, say one of P-T?  Or all
     processes P-T?  Your purpose would seem to require control
     of all the major primaries."

The concept we were examining imagined a single nominating process in which partisans and non-partisans nominate candidates for public office. After being nominated, the nominees for each party (and the non-partisan nominees as a group) decide which of the nominees are the best advocates of the party's point of view. Then, the remaining partisan/non-partisan nominees examine each other to decide which of their number will be the candidates for public office. Then the people vote for their choice of the candidates. The question of how many candidates there would be for each office was not discussed, and, barring further discussion, would be left to those who implement the process.

Fred
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to