On 1/18/13 1:52 AM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
On 01/17/2013 06:07 PM, Richard Fobes wrote:
Soon enough, just as has happened in Aspen (CO) and Burlington (VT), the
weaknesses of IRV counting will get exposed. In the meantime, just
getting people to talk about, and think about, the possibility of better
ballots and better counting methods is a wonderful development.
I just hope that won't lead to a false confusion of IRV with ranked
balloting itself and thus thoughts that ranked balloting can't work
because IRV blows up spectacularly in an n-way race with n > 2.
i wrote the guy to tell him not to confuse the two.
--
r b-j r...@audioimagination.com
"Imagination is more important than knowledge."
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
