On 25.6.2013, at 1.06, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote: > Remember that criterion compliances are absolute. So a method may fail a > criterion yet be perfectly acceptable in real elections.
I just want to support this viewpoint. It is not essential how many criteria a mehod violates. It is more important how bad those violations are, i.e. if the method likely have serious problems or not. The best method might well be a method that violates multiple criteria, but manages to spread the (unavoidable) problems evenly so that all of them stay insignificant. Juho ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
