Mistake:
----- Mail original ----- > De : Kevin Venzke <step...@yahoo.fr> > À : Forest Simmons <fsimm...@pcc.edu>; em <election-meth...@electorama.com> > Cc : > Envoyé le : Dimanche 13 octobre 2013 12h02 > Objet : Re: [EM] MMPO(IA>MPO) (was IA/MMPO) > > Hi Forest, > > I read your first message: At first glance I think the new method (elect the > MMPO winner among those candidates whose IA>=MPO) is good. It doesn't > seem to gain SFC, which is actually reassuring, that this might be a > substantially different method from others. Actually it does satisfy SFC. That's fine too, I guess? So really, the method is a more ranking-sensitive version of MAMPO. Suppose that SFC disqualifies B due to A. (There's an A>B majority, but no majorities over A.) That means A's IA-MPO is positive. B's IA-MPO could be positive as well. But his MPO is >50% while A's is less. So, B won't win. Kevin Venzke ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
