That would be nice if the bug were actually fixed. There seems to be a fix for the original problem with IRSIM, however using the latest IRSIM/Electric version 9.01, I'm still experiencing incorrect waveform output; the inputs are screwed up, even though the circuit is actually simulating correctly.
On Sep 22, 1:38 pm, Steven Rubin <[email protected]> wrote: > At 07:51 PM 9/20/2011, you wrote: > > >I can provide you with a simple example. I've built a simple NAND2 > >example, which has been verified by DRC, and is running a testbench > >for IRSIM that does not produce any assertion errors if the gate has > >been built correctly. When run in Electric, on both versions 9.00 and > >8.11, there is no issue with the assertions. However, in Electric > >9.00, the output waveform does not display the correct input stimuli, > >although the output seems correct. I've tried redownloading IRSIM and > >electric, so I know its (likely) not a corrupt file issue. It almost > >seems as if the waveform is corrupt for the first 40ns. Even a simple > >CMOS inversion gate shows the same properties, the gate input does not > >change in the waveform, even though IRSIM thinks it does. The > >testbench can be found below: > > Thanks for the report. This bug has been fixed for a while now, so > you can have a working Electric if you build it from the sources at > java.net. But even better news is that a new version of Electric > (9.01) is due out in a few weeks, so this bug will be fixed there, too. > > -Steven Rubin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Electric VLSI Editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/electricvlsi?hl=en.
