>Actually, the .rule file of
>microwind is relatively simpler and may be converted into .xml file for
>inclusion in Electric.

I think it's okay.
Still need to save standard technology  MOCMOS to XML and compare vs.
design rules PDF.

It may be a first step to creation XML file for microwind.

The main problem I think, is that there are not so many people who can help
the process sined NDA :(



On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 9:30 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> [email protected]
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_source=digest&utm_medium=email#!forum/electricvlsi/topics>
>  Google
> Groups
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_source=digest&utm_medium=email/#!overview>
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_source=digest&utm_medium=email/#!overview>
> Topic digest
> View all topics
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_source=digest&utm_medium=email#!forum/electricvlsi/topics>
>
>    - Thesis on Electric VLSI Design System
>    <#m_3741244872247199131_group_thread_0> - 1 Update
>    - Digest for [email protected] - 1 update in 1 topic
>    <#m_3741244872247199131_group_thread_1> - 1 Update
>
> Thesis on Electric VLSI Design System
> <http://groups.google.com/group/electricvlsi/t/f31702c631a72856?utm_source=digest&utm_medium=email>
> Rahul <[email protected]>: Sep 02 07:18AM -0700
>
> Hi guys,
>
> while I was looking for some projects on the electric tool for reference I
> came across this thesis.
>
> Hope it may be helpful for you guys.
>
> Here is the link: http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc849770/
> Back to top <#m_3741244872247199131_digest_top>
> Digest for [email protected] - 1 update in 1 topic
> <http://groups.google.com/group/electricvlsi/t/da4dec4e81490273?utm_source=digest&utm_medium=email>
> Naushad Alam <[email protected]>: Sep 01 11:42PM -0700
>
> Hello Alexandre Rusev,
>
> I am also interested in this project. However, can we try converting
> technology file that come with Microwind? Actually, the .rule file of
> microwind is relatively simpler and may be converted into .xml file for
> inclusion in Electric.
>
> What is your opinion?
>
> Regards,
>
> On Monday, 29 August 2016 22:30:12 UTC+5:30, Alexandre Rusev wrote:
> Back to top <#m_3741244872247199131_digest_top>
> You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this
> group. You can change your settings on the group membership page
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_source=digest&utm_medium=email#!forum/electricvlsi/join>
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an
> email to [email protected].
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Electric VLSI Editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to