I agree with Andrea. It might be better to just remove the most used but and
revisit "smart categories" for the next version of slingshot. There's a nice
blueprint about that kind of thing that would fit nicely in the Luna +1 cycle.
And yes would should definitely focus as much as possible on items that are
strictly relevant to Luna. We're getting so very very close to beta and if we
can just focus our energy we'd be closer to release :)
Best Regards,
Daniel Foré
El may 5, 2012, a las 1:07 p.m., Andrea Basso <voluntatefa...@gmail.com>
escribió:
> I agree with Shnatsel, it's better if we put off L+1 items.
>
> On the other hand, I find items #5 and #7 pretty important. About #7, I'd
> remove "Most Used" ('cause it's a duplicate of the Dock and if we remove it
> we fix 3/4 bugs which would need to be fixed for Luna) and think about a
> "Last Used" for Luna+1 only. It's better to ship a software with few complete
> features than one with many incomplete ones and since "Last Used" requires
> Dock/Open Window integration and we're over Feature Freeze, it's definitely
> for L+1 (IMHO).
>
> Regards,
> Andrea Basso
>
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Sergey "Shnatsel" Davidoff
> <ser...@elementaryos.org> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Sorry I didn't make it.
>
> Regarding #6: it would be a good idea for Luna+1. I hope we'll get decent
> llvmpipe-based software rendering fallback by then; current ubuntu's softpipe
> is a bloody mess, even in the LTS.
>
> On #11: the function of navigation arrows is not obvious at a glance, in
> particular, I can't see how they're different from forward/back. But this is
> a Luna+1 item anyway, I don't think it's a good idea to discuss it until we
> release Luna.
>
> In fact, there's a lot of Luna+1 items in every contributor meeting...
> deciding them now, before we get a full overview of the idea pool we have for
> Luna+1, might be wrong. And they distract us from a much more urgent goal -
> Luna. Why don't we put these items and let them pile up in some other doc
> till we release Luna, get rid of technological debt and then get to L+1
> planning?
>
> --
> Sergey "Shnatsel" Davidoff
> OS integrator @ elementary
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community
> Post to : elementary-dev-community@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community
> Post to : elementary-dev-community@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community
Post to : elementary-dev-community@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
