I was not talking about porting all the apps to Qt, actually this is not
necessary you can run GTK+ apps over a Qt Wayland compositor without any
problems, I was talking about write *one* app using Qt.
But if for some good reason you don't want to include Qt in the default CD
image (to save a couple of MB?) then that is OK otherwise let me know, I'd
be more than happy to collaborate with the eOS project :)
2014-06-06 18:50 GMT+01:00 Jacob Parker <jacobparker1...@gmail.com>:
> José,
>
> There is no possibility of porting to Qt, as all the apps are done with
> Vala (dependency on Gtk). Gtk+ also supports Wayland.
>
> Hope this helps!
>
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 6:41 pm, José Expósito <jose.exposit...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering what are the plans of the eOS team about Wayland. Are you
> choosing Wayland or Mir?
>
> Personally speaking, I think that Wayland is the correct option here for a
> lots of reasons, so I made a proof of concept C++/QML compositor that looks
> like [1].
>
> I know that elementary OS relies on GTK+ but in my opinion, talking about
> Wayland and interface design, Qt is a step ahead GTK+, allowing you to make
> 100% customizable GUIs without many effort.
> To quote some example, as you can see in the screenshot, the window shadow
> is implemented in 7 QML lines:
>
> RectangularGlow {
>
> anchors.fill: parent
>
> glowRadius: shadowRadius
>
> spread: 0.2
>
> color: Qt.rgba(0,0,0,0.5)
>
> cornerRadius: shadowRadius
>
> }
>
>
> And the fade in/out effect for opening/closing windows is implemented in 3
> lines:
>
>
> Behavior on opacity {
>
> NumberAnimation { easing.type: Easing.InCubic; duration: 400; }
>
> }
>
>
> Plus you can build 100% custom responsive UIs (phone, tablet and desktop
> in the same app without many changes) with cool animations as you can see
> in this other project [2] And yes... that means that it is possible to
> adapt the compositor to run it in different kind of devices like phones or
> tablets.
>
> And all of this is hardware accelerated :) So, after pointing why I used
> Qt instead of GTK+ to build this proof of concept compositor, I'd like to
> ask you... Are you guys interested on porting the eOS shell to Wayland?
> Would you be interested in the use of Qt, or do you prefer to maintain a
> GTK+ only system for some reason? If the answer is yes, would you be
> interested on my collaboration?
>
> I'm waiting for your reply,
> Thank you!
>
> [1] http://oi60.tinypic.com/ekrjaw.jpg
> [2] https://github.com/JoseExposito/ubuntuone-qt-files
>
>
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community
Post to : elementary-dev-community@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
