On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 12:03 +1100, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 03/09/2011 11:17 AM, Roland McGrath wrote: > >> section [ 5] '.dynsym': symbol 61: unknown bit set in st_other > >> section [ 5] '.dynsym': symbol 64: unknown bit set in st_other > >> section [28] '.symtab': symbol 27: unknown bit set in st_other > >> section [28] '.symtab': symbol 34: unknown bit set in st_other > >> section [28] '.symtab': symbol 35: unknown bit set in st_other > >> section [28] '.symtab': symbol 36: unknown bit set in st_other > >> section [28] '.symtab': symbol 37: unknown bit set in st_other > >> section [28] '.symtab': symbol 38: unknown bit set in st_other > >> section [28] '.symtab': _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ symbol value 0x120014010 > >> does not match .got section address 0x120014000 > > > > These indicate either bugs in the compilation tools (probably ld) or else > > machine-specific oddities that the elfutils backend library for alpha needs > > to be taught to allow. > > The later. From <elf.h>: > > /* Legal values for st_other field of Elf64_Sym. */ > #define STO_ALPHA_NOPV 0x80 /* No PV required. */ > #define STO_ALPHA_STD_GPLOAD 0x88 /* PV only used for initial ldgp. */
If you are using these, should ELF64_ST_VISIBILITY be extended? Also from <elf.h>: /* How to extract and insert information held in the st_other field. */ #define ELF32_ST_VISIBILITY(o) ((o) & 0x03) /* For ELF64 the definitions are the same. */ #define ELF64_ST_VISIBILITY(o) ELF32_ST_VISIBILITY (o) That is what elflint checks here. Cheers, Mark _______________________________________________ elfutils-devel mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/elfutils-devel
