Hi - On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 01:53:12PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > [...] > > > > (gdb) bt > > > > #0 0x00000000100004d0 in .f () > > > > #1 0x0000000010000500 in .main () > [...] > But I don't see why that has to leak through to the user in a backtrace > where they just want to know which function name corresponds to a > specific address. The extra dot doesn't add any value in this case and > is just confusing.
Not entirely -- the two locations are distinct, and a breakpoint can pass through one and not the other, which could make a difference to certain low-level debugging tasks. - FChE _______________________________________________ elfutils-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/elfutils-devel
