On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 12:30:21 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > But I am not entirely sure what the *shndxp value should point to. I > guess for an "altered" function symbol it will still always point to the > function descriptor (.odp) section. So then if the user really cares > then they can inspect the shndxp value returned to see whether the > st_value really falls into it (I guess this is just an oddity those on > function descriptor based arches need to life with). What is your > opinion here?
My opinion was in the original patch post. It was adjusting *shndxp to the VMA-matching section (therefore usually the .text section). > And I am still not really happy about the altered name thing though. I > really think we should just return the name of the ELF symbol against > which we resolved the address. Dynamically creating strings seems messy. Do you care about the name having a dot or do you care about dynamically creating strings? Those two issues are very separate ones. Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ elfutils-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/elfutils-devel
