On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 11:25 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > Wouldn't the new definition just work always? > > Yes but it will no longer sanity check the two implementations have the same > prototype. Which may be useful in many (most?) use cases of it.
Makes sense. > > (I still don't fully understand that last asm bit). > > info '(gcc)Asm Labels' > > IIUC there was an intention that someone cannot call the > compatibility-only-variant by accident (as one cannot call a function from > C containing '.' dot). Sure even the caller could use the asm label to call > this '_compat.ELFUTILS_0.122.dwfl_report_elf' function but if the caller knows > how to use the asm label s/he should know it is not right to call this one. Aha, clever. Looks good to me. I think you should check it in unless Roland has some comments on it. Thanks, Mark _______________________________________________ elfutils-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/elfutils-devel
