On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 22:52 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > The more conservative check would be != SHT_NOBITS, wouldn't it? > I can imagine some machine using a processor-specific type for .eh_frame > rather than SHT_PROGBITS, even if none do that now.
The reason I didn't do that was because the gLSB spec does explicitly say .eh_frame should be SHT_PROGBITS and as you say all current machines do. So I would expect trouble if we assumed everything else would be just the same .eh_frame bits if they don't even follow that part. Cheers, Mark _______________________________________________ elfutils-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/elfutils-devel
