On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:07:30 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Then the only feature you seem to want that is missing is a real search > on name or identifier. Where the identifier might have some modifier(s) > that have a possible arch specific meaning that matches it to some > address and/or some other properties. I think that needs its own > specific interface though. And it also doesn't seem immediately needed > right now (in contrast with the address lookups which make the unwinder > more useful).
OK, we disagree here but let it be that way. The current code reports wrong symbol name, no matter which way it is called. I have already written too many text about it I would just repeat myself. Regards, Jan
