On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:55:49 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > So it looks like some extra padding was included in the function by the > compiler. Should we make this check is_x86_64_native only like the case > 3 jmp one?
OK, I will make it. It may apparently fail even on x86_64, just so far we have a luck gcc compiles it the current way. To make it the reliable there would have to be -S precompiled .S file. Thanks, Jan
