On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 18:44 -0800, Josh Stone wrote: > Ok, well my former optimizations went into 0.158. Here are some quick > runs of "varlocs -k >/dev/null" on kernel-3.17.4-301.fc21.x86_64: > > 0.157 96.00user 0.12system 1:36.08elapsed > 0.158 70.22user 0.12system 1:10.32elapsed > 0.159 71.40user 0.11system 1:11.48elapsed > 0.160 73.24user 0.12system 1:13.33elapsed > master 77.65user 0.10system 1:17.72elapsed > patched 77.87user 0.10system 1:17.93elapsed > > So each release has ceded a bit of performance, but this particular > patch isn't much of an issue. Correctness trumps performance anyway.
Thanks for all the testing (and for your patches trying to get our performance back). I have now pushed this overflow checking patch to master. Cheers, Mark
