On Apr 3, 2015 5:31 PM, "Petr Machata" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jan Heylen <[email protected]> writes: > > > Ok, I was thinking it would go into this direction. I'm willing to do > > the effort for this (as having the right backend installed could be > > useful one day indeed), should I even consider looking at the > > mjw/RH-DTS branch? Or how do you propose I could tackle this? > > The main purpose of the DTS branch is static linking, and that in turn > we do due to requirements of Red Hat Developer Toolset (RH DTS). The > fact that we only build a subset of arches stems from that--it wouldn't > be practical to bundle the whole bunch with each application that uses > libelf or libdw. > > The changes that were needed to achieve the above weren't particularly > clean, and I doubt it would be useful to look at the code.
I had a look, indeed not what I need, I was already looking at autoconf and parsing the list of backends, only need to find a way to get the available backends from the backends subfolder/makefile Jan > Thanks, > Petr
